On 03/02/2013 17:26, Joel M. Halpern wrote:
> To a significant degree Randy, I agree with you in your comment about
> magic bits. If I were designing IPv6 from scratch (counter-factual in
> so may ways at once) I would not do it that way.
>
> But, unless there is an actual problem with the design the IETF has
> adopted, I am reluctant to change it "just because".
Which is why the draft actually proposes nothing that would change
any running code.
Brian
>
> Yours,
> Joel
>
> On 2/3/2013 4:46 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
> ...
>> i hate to sound like a broken record, but magic bits are almost never
>> worth the pain.
>>
>> randy
>
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
