> To a significant degree Randy, I agree with you in your comment about > magic bits. If I were designing IPv6 from scratch (counter-factual in > so may ways at once) I would not do it that way. > > But, unless there is an actual problem with the design the IETF has > adopted, I am reluctant to change it "just because".
i know. ipv6 is perfect, widely deployed, and unchangable. i hope we all like v4 nat. randy -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
