That is not what I said. Christian, thank you, that is the kibd of information I was looking for, and expect in the draft or from the authors.
Yours, Joel Sent from my Samsung smartphone on AT&T -------- Original message -------- Subject: Re: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-ug-00.txt] From: Randy Bush <[email protected]> To: "Joel M. Halpern" <[email protected]> CC: Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]>,IPv6 Deployment Prevention <[email protected]> > To a significant degree Randy, I agree with you in your comment about > magic bits. If I were designing IPv6 from scratch (counter-factual in > so may ways at once) I would not do it that way. > > But, unless there is an actual problem with the design the IETF has > adopted, I am reluctant to change it "just because". i know. ipv6 is perfect, widely deployed, and unchangable. i hope we all like v4 nat. randy
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
