Simon, >> What does "working on a document" mean? For instance, it's probably the >> first time I see this question asked when polling the wg for support of >> a document. > > It's common. I understand it to mean reviewing the draft, providing comments, > etc.
yes. >> That aside, this document aims to update RFC 2460. Where else should >> that be done, if not in 6man?? > > That's a technicality. What's more important is that the relevant expertise > is in 6man. when this document was presented in 6man at IETF84, there were suggestions that a more generic document could be written. e.g. in intarea. I don't want us to end up with an RFC per field per protocol. there isn't an equivalent document for IPv4, right? there are other alternatives too, e.g. an errata to 2460, or an update to the nodes requirement document. cheers, Ole -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
