Hi, Zhou,

On 03/19/2013 06:14 AM, [email protected] wrote:
> 
> I kind did not understand the privacy issues of RFC4941 describbed in
> Appendeix A.
> To my reading and understanding of RFC4941,
>   RFC4941 specified to use privacy/temporary address defined as:
>     temporary address= subnet Prefix|| Randomized interface identifier
>     Randomized interface identifier=Hash(fixed interface identifier||64
> bits random bits)_left64bits;
> 
> Compared to the calcualation proposed in
> draft-ietf-6man-stable-privacy-addresses-03
> 
> RID = F(Prefix, Interface_Index, Network_ID, DAD_Counter, secret_key)
> _left64bits
> 
> They have no essential difference considering secret_key may be random
> bits.

* draft-ietf-6man-stable-privacy-addresses includes the network prefix
in the hash. This is introduces a key property of these addresses: they
are stable within the local network, but change from one network to another.

* RFC 4941 includes the non-random (typically MAC-address-based) in the
hash. As a result, you replace the NIC, your address changes. OTOH,
draft-ietf-6man-stable-privacy-addresses does not include the MAC
address but rather includes the Interface-Index. Hence, even if you
change the NIC, your IPv6 address does not change.


> I wonder how an attacker can track a host by such randomizide IID?
> 
> The only privacy problem I can think of in RFC4941, is that, a  host may
> have two addresses at the same time, one public fixed address for
> server-function,and one temporay address,
> But if only temp address is used,how can a host be tracked across network?

Agreed. But RFC4941 states that temporary addresses be generated in
addition to the stable address.

draft-ietf-6man-stable-privacy-addresses is meant to be an alternative
algorithm for generating the stable addresses. As a result, there are no
IIDs that are constant across networks, and this issue is mitigated.

Thanks,
-- 
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: [email protected]
PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492




--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to