Hi Carsten,
----- Original Message ----- > From: Carsten Bormann <[email protected]> > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected]; "[email protected] List" <[email protected]>; "core > ([email protected])" <[email protected]> > Sent: Saturday, 30 March 2013 12:22 AM > Subject: GHC now crunches DTLS (Re: [Roll] [6lowpan] draft-bormann-ghc) > > On Aug 25, 2012, at 13:41, peter van der Stok <[email protected]> wrote: > <snip> > I'm CCing 6man because part of the proposal is a new ND (ICMPv6) option for > node capability indication. Just focusing on this, I wonder if it would be better to create a more general purpose capability option for ND, limited to layer 3 capabilities (I think stateless/stateful DHCPv6 would be the place for layer 4 and above capability indications), of which 6LoWPAN/GHC uses one of the bits. RFC5175, "IPv6 Router Advertisement Flags Option" could probably be an example to model the text on, perhaps in a different ID. Best regards, Mark. > Specific comments on that probably best go to the 6man mailing list. > > Grüße, Carsten > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > [email protected] > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
