On Wednesday, April 24, 2013 06:52:28 PM Simon Perreault wrote: > Le 2013-04-24 18:46, Scott Kitterman a écrit : > > So from your perspective, we could remove that guidance and replace it > > with > > something along the lines of: > > > > Check_host() [that's our generic SPF validation function name we use in > > the > > document] should never see IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses. The underlying > > layer needs to convert them to IPv4 addresses. > > > > Is that about right? > > Yes, that's perfect. > > Now, there's nothing specific to SPF here, but I don't know of any > general guidelines that you could reference, so feel free to go ahead > with that.
Thanks. I'll use that unless Phil responds and it turns out you two need to argue some more. Scott K -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
