> Here's what is read: "IPv6 is a well-defined set of completed standards." > > Here's what is seen: "Lots of RFCs, both 'standard track' and informational, and > IETF drafts floating around." [1][2] > > 1. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg79157.html > 2. http://ripe58.ripe.net/content/presentations/ietf-update.pdf >
In my opinion, it is better to update the current RFCs or obsolete them instead of adding more specifications which will result on confusing vendors. Of course, it is my point of view and some people are disagree with that. They would like to have several optional standards and let the implementers to choose. Hosnieh -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
