On Jun 2, 2013, at 6:17 PM, Ted Lemon <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Jun 2, 2013, at 5:02 PM, Tim Chown <[email protected]> wrote: >> Isn't the hipnet model one with recursive PD? > > Yes. A fine engineering solution for demonstration purposes, but not a good > solution for us to recommend for deployment in the long term. Because it > commits wide prefixes to sub-delegations, it wastes address space > profligately, and likely would require a /48 for a fairly trivial subnetted > homenet. > You say that as if it would be a bad thing. I don't see a problem with it. Owen
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
