>From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
>Fred Baker (fred)
>Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2013 3:49 AM
>To: Ronald Bonica
>Cc: [email protected] 6man-wg
>Subject: Re: New Version Notification for
>draft-bonica-6man-frag-deprecate-00.txt
>
>I suppose I'm the contrarian

+1. For me, this draft looks dangerous by proposing to deprecate fragmentation 
with only one-side observation. This draft does not give enough analysis on 
these existing fragmentation use cases, particularly these use cases the 
fragments within a single domain.

On other side , only disallowing fragmentation to be used among domains may 
helpful to reduce the operational complex.

Best regards,

Sheng

>but this draft gives me some heartburn
>surrounding the robustness principle. Yes, TCP MSS generally limits the use of
>fragmentation for IPv6. We don't have a counterpart to MSS for UDP, and
>others have noted that OSPF etc may have issues.
>
>Thinking hypothetically, it would be unusual for OSPF to not be able to
>manage packet size via LSA choice, but suppose I am on an interface that has
>a given MTU, and I have a single LSA that is larger than that MTU, perhaps a
>Router LSA on a wide fan-out unit. Deprecating the fragmentation capability
>forces each client of the network layer to create a means for
>fragmentation/segmentation. That might be some other protocol that
>essentially duplicates what we're deprecating, or it could be something in
>which a router has to make enough routing instances of itself to split the
>Router LSA across them, or something like that.
>
>Personally, I think I would prefer a statement that says that the first 
>fragment
>MUST contain the transport header (which Fernando has been pushing), and
>encourages transports and applications to implement some variation on
>PMTU rather than depending on fragmentation, but not deprecating the
>capability.
>--------------------------------------------------------------------
>IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
>[email protected]
>Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
>--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to