* Brian E Carpenter | 2013-06-27 13:14:12 [+1200]:
>Cutting to the chase, and assuming that the next version
>will have more analysis and observational evidence, I'm thinking
>something like the following:
Nearly, skip five words: "and the IPv6 fragment header". One more time: a
client of mine deploy sensor network applications using fragmentation. Not
just for fun, no because of 2460. Think about this: if this ID becomes an RFC
(or even earlier) someone posts a patch removing fragmentation from
Linux/*BSD,3 month later all distribution ship a fragmentation/reassembly less
stack. This breaks application, application which cannot changed because they
are hard wired into silicon (DSP). This incompatible protocol break needs more
time to mature out everywhere.
I support the deprecation of fragmentation, but we need reassembling for a
transition period - not fragmentation. But this is not in contradiction with
the current effort here - everybody can be happy. My recommendation (slightly
changed version, see second sentence):
3. Recommendation
This memo deprecates IPv6 fragmentation. Host SHOULD still be able to
reassembly fragmented packets. Application and transport layer
protocols
SHOULD support effective PMTU discovery [RFC4821], since ICMP-based
PMTU
discovery [RFC1981] is unreliable. Any application or transport layer
protocol that cannot support effective PMTU discovery MUST NOT in any
circumstances send IPv6 packets that exceed the IPv6 minimum MTU of
1280
bytes.
IPv6 stacks and forwarding nodes SHOULD continue to support inbound
fragmented IPv6 packets as specified in [RFC2460]. However, this
requirement exceeds the capability of some types of forwarding node
such as firewalls and load balancers. Therefore implementers and
operators need to be aware that on many paths through the Internet,
IPv6 fragmentation will fail. Legacy applications and transport layer
protocols that do not conform to the previous paragraph can expect
connectivity failures as a result.
Hagen
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
