Hi Brian,

----- Original Message -----
> From: Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]>
> To: Mark ZZZ Smith <[email protected]>
> Cc: IPv6 IPv6 List <[email protected]>
> Sent: Tuesday, 23 July 2013 8:00 AM
> Subject: Re: 6MAN WG Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-ug-01.txt>
> 
> On 23/07/2013 09:12, Mark ZZZ Smith wrote:
>>  Hi,
>> 
  
<snip> 

>> 
>>  "  Also, there is
>>     evidence from the field that IEEE MAC addresses with "u" = 0 
> are
>>     sometime incorrectly assigned to multiple MAC interfaces.  Firstly,
>>     there are recurrent reports of manufacturers assigning the same MAC
>>     address to multiple devices. Secondly, significant re-use of the
>>     same virtual MAC address is reported in virtual machine environments. 
> "
>> 
>>  I found this text a bit confusing. The '"u" = 0' term 
> read like it was referring to locally unique IEEE MAC addresses ("unique 
> equals no"), and then the 2nd sentence is referring to globally unique (but 
> duplicated and therefore not actually globally unique) MAC addresses, u = 1 
> in 
> an IPv6 IID, the opposite of what the previous sentence was referring to. 
> Then 
> the third sentence seems to be describing to what the first sentence was 
> referring to. I think the cause of the confusion might be that IEEE use the 
> "locally assigned" bit to distinguish locally generated or not (i.e., 
> "l" = 0 for globally unique), where as IPv6 IIDs have renamed it to 
> "u" bit when the value is inverted. I'd suggest trying to ensure 
> the IEEE terminology is used when IEEE addresses are discussed to make it 
> clearer what the properties of the IEEE address are.
> 
> Yep. I remember complaining when the bit inversion was first proposed
> that it would lead to years of confusion. Which IEEE standard is the
> basic reference for their terminology?
> 

I understand the canonical definition of 48-bit universal LAN MAC addresses is 
in:

IEEE Std 802®-2001 - 802® IEEE Standard for Local and Metropolitan Area 
Networks: Overview and Architecture

(http://standards.ieee.org/getieee802/download/802-2001.pdf)

>From page 21, it seems what I knew as the "locally assigned" bit is actually 
>the "Universally or Locally administered (U/L) address bit".

Regards,
Mark.

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to