On Jul 24, 2013, at 4:58 PM 7/24/13, Michael Richardson <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I would still like an explanation of why "subnet" is the wrong term. > > When would scope-3 would be used such that it would not correspond to the set > of links on which a "/64" (or other size) is used? Hm, I thought I responded but apparently not... This change to scope 0x03 is not just for MPL, so we don't know how else it might be used in the future. Specific examples: 1) two adjacent RPL domains, which do not share a prefix but are to be considered as one realm for mDNS 2) one RPL domain and one other non-RPL subnet that are to be considered as one realm for mDNS - Ralph > > -- > Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
