Hi Michael, I mispoke on the last point. Should have read: multi-link subnets versus allocating a /128
Don On 7/25/13 3:07 PM, "Michael Richardson" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >Don Sturek <[email protected]> wrote: > > We did a good bit of work on the mDNS topic and there are quite a >few > > subtleties in the mDNS draft that are really focused only on >correct link > > local operation. Here are a few (from RFC 6762): > >Ah, I understand now, and I agree. >I thought you were saying that mDNS replies could not have ULAs in their >answer sections. > >I agree that all of the things you mention have to be adjusted in order to >permit mDNS to work over MPL. > >My question remains: > > > I would like to know what a multi-link subnet via /128 means. > > >-- >Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
