On Jul 30, 2013, at 01:34 , Ronald Bonica <[email protected]> wrote: > > --- Therefore, if a legacy protocol is capable of breaking its dependence on > IPv6 fragmentation, it should consider doing so.
As I read this latest message, it would appear that this sentence I quoted above is the only remaining thing the draft will actually be telling people in my position to do with legacy host stack implementations. How to say this politely? I think this recommendation is, at best... unnecessary. -- james woodyatt <[email protected]> core os networking -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
