In your previous mail you wrote: > And if we generate appoximately equal sized fragments rather than > 1280 byte fragments + a runt fragment tunnels would need to fragment > less often. Your 1500 byte UDP payloads become 2 x 750 byte fragments > which can be encapulated multiple times.
=> I did this for the ISC AFTR code (the partner asked for). > It doesn't take a lot of math to work out what size to fragment at to > produce optimal fragment sizes for a given MTU. => yes, it is not hard even the alignment constraints are not too easy to handle (I coded it in two parts, first compute an ideal fragment size, second integrate alignment constraints to produce fragments with the same size at the exception of the last one). I didn't see a huge difference but it looks better on the wire, no tiny last fragement for instance... Regards [email protected] -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
