At Tue, 30 Jul 2013 14:42:28 +0000, "Ralph Droms (rdroms)" <[email protected]> wrote:
> This rev includes the fixes discussed and agreed to in the 6man WG meeting on > 7/29: I'm not sure if this version addresses the second comment of mine on the 00 version, which you seem to have accepted: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/current/msg18553.html Maybe the following paragraph also intends to cover that point? > * Added a paragraph, based on the suggestion from Dave Thaler, further > defining "Realm-Local scope": > > Realm-Local scope is the largest scope that is automatically > configured, i.e., automatically derived from physical > connectivity or other, non-multicast-related configuration. -- JINMEI, Tatuya Infoblox Inc. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
