On 06 Aug 2013, at 06:52 , Ole Troan wrote: > the significant change to the architecture in your proposal, > is that intermediate routers (in this case the tunnel ingress) > are allowed to fragment packets.
That is a misunderstanding of what I wrote. Tunnel ingress devices already are allowed to fragment IPv6 packets by various IETF approved tunnelling specifications, as you have agreed. To be VERY clear, I am not proposing ANY change to specs. If one thinks I have proposed a specification change, that is a misunderstanding. I am simply observing that end systems ALREADY are required to support IPv6 fragment reassembly -- e.g., for reasons unrelated to tunnels. Yours, Ran -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
