Fernando, Thanks for your comments.
> * In Section 1, you should probably remove some of the general discussion on > security and privacy here. For instance, some of your definitions seem > incomplete. Ok, I think I just did not want to jump to the topic and have a kind of introduction. Maybe I just refer to cooper's draft. > * Section 6 is fine... but I don't think the rest of the stuff is needed. Ok. I will remove them > * Section 7 should probably be removed and just reference draft-6man-cooper- > ipv6-addressing-privacy-considerations. Ok, I will do it > Meta comment: If an implementation is going through the burden of > implementing this algorithm, it might as well implement a good PRNG, and be > done with it (if I understand correctly, the motivation for specifying this > algorithm is that you don't have a good PRNG, right?). One reason is PRNG and the other reason is in case the node doesn't want to use stable storage. Thanks, Best, Hosnieh -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
