After reviewing the adoption call comments, the chairs have decided not to adopt draft-gont-ipv6-smurf-amplifier.
- We have not seen strong working group support for working on the draft. - We are not convinced that the problem the draft sets out to resolve is worth fixing given that multicast RPF checking eliminates the vast majority of the attack vector. Best regards, Bob & Ole > All, > > This message starts a one week 6MAN Working Group call on adopting: > > Title : Security Implications of IPv6 Options of Type 10xxxxxx > Author(s) : F. Gont, W. Liu > Filename : draft-gont-6man-ipv6-smurf-amplifier-03 > Pages : 12 > Date : 2013-03-21 > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gont-6man-ipv6-smurf-amplifier-03 > > The call ends on August 30th, 2013. > > Regards, > > Bob Hinden & Ole Trøan > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > ipv6@ietf.org > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > --------------------------------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
