Hi Barry,
On 05/10/2013 07:29, Barry Leiba wrote:
...
> -- Section 4 --
>
> Additionally, IANA is requested to make the existing empty IPv6 Next
> Header Types registry redirect users to a new IPv6 Extension Header
> Types registry. It will contain only those protocol numbers which
> are also marked as IPv6 Extension Header types in the Assigned
> Internet Protocol Numbers registry.
>
> Two small points here:
>
> 1. "It" in the second sentence is ambiguous: it could refer to either of
> the registries mentioned in the first sentence. I suggest making it "The
> IPv6 Extension Header Types registry will contain...".
OK
>
> 2. Is it your intent that the (empty) IPv6 Next Header Types registry
> also be closed to new registrations? Whether or not, it would be best to
> make that clear.
Good catch. IMHO, it should be formally closed.
I'd be happy to see these as RFC Editor changes.
Thanks
Brian
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
