On Saturday 11 Feb 2012 20:41:36 Jarrod Johnson wrote: > In the same way iPXE exports its capabilities under BIOS in a way that > pxelinux.0 exploits to get better protocols than tftp, export capabilities > as a UEFI protocol so that other efi binaries may use it instead of tftp. > Can be used together with a patch submitted to elilo for one example: > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.elilo.general/147 > > https://git.ipxe.org/vendor/xcat/ipxe.git/commitdiff/d748ebf72206dcde1379b0 > 63fd9b533f7572caa5 > https://git.ipxe.org/vendor/xcat/ipxe.git/commitdiff/e7b41890bc67350a9f5bc > f7291ec859fa2174e26 > https://git.ipxe.org/vendor/xcat/ipxe.git/commitdiff/45a51f99fd51b231a388b > 1db00dfc4b18a5e9e4f > https://git.ipxe.org/vendor/xcat/ipxe.git/commitdiff/a84739023c391fa4d5e3b > 65a487834bf92552895 > https://git.ipxe.org/vendor/xcat/ipxe.git/commitdiff/23aea6c209965546c3956 > 9a770823eabf1358a71
I've merged these into a single patch (not yet merged): http://git.ipxe.org/people/mcb30/ipxe.git/commitdiff/1730726 This is produced by taking your commits, converting initial spaces to tabs where applicable, and changing "gPXE" to "iPXE" where applicable. I also tidied up what looked like some dubious error handling in efi_image.c: errors were being ignored, and nothing ever freed the memory allocated by efi_image_make_cmdline(). I've put in what I think should be correct code, but I haven't tested it in any way. Please let me know if you think this modified patch is OK to merge. Thanks, Michael _______________________________________________ ipxe-devel mailing list ipxe-devel@lists.ipxe.org https://lists.ipxe.org/mailman/listinfo/ipxe-devel