On 03/28/2018 09:02 PM, Michael Brown wrote: > On 28/03/18 19:49, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: >> The old coding resulted in a "data abort" when compiled with gcc 6.3 for >> armhf and run on an Allwinner A20 SOC. >> >> The unaligned access occured when path->Length was on an uneven address. > > There's no way that the code: > >> - ( ( path->Length[1] << 8 ) | path->Length[0] ) ); > > should ever be able to produce an unaligned access abort, since it just > dereferences individual bytes. What do you see if you disassemble the > object code? > > Michael > Hello Michael,
I put a DGBC before and after the access. And this is were the interrupt occurs. I do not know how to disassemble the object code. Which files do you need? Best regards Heinrich _______________________________________________ ipxe-devel mailing list ipxe-devel@lists.ipxe.org https://lists.ipxe.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/ipxe-devel