Hi Christian, Not yet, but I'm certainly interested. How do I search for these previous emails of which you speak?
On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 8:46 PM Christian Nilsson <nik...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Sat, 2 May 2020, 07:36 Neil Roza, <n...@rtr.ai> wrote: > >> Hi ipxe-devel, >> >> Please find the attached diff representing a patch I would like to submit >> for your consideration. This is a small change to the >> `src/Makefile.housekeeping` that makes the generation of most artifacts >> (notably not `*.usb` images) deterministic. >> >> The scariest change here is the removal of the `BUILD_ID_CMD` in favor of >> an inlined shell snippet where the `_build_id` symbol is defined. In >> keeping with the comments that specify a unique `_build_id` for each >> `$(BIN)/%.tmp`, I use the first 8 characters of the md5sum of the target, >> in the expected base-prefixed hexadecimal representation. Calculating the >> likelihood of collisions I leave as an exercise to the reviewer. :D >> >> The `BUILD_TIMESTAMP` assignment has been changed to allow environment >> variable overriding, but it defaults to `SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH`. The source >> date epoch can also be overridden; it defaults to the Unix timestamp of the >> current git HEAD commit. >> >> I like reproducible builds, but I recognize that others have different >> concerns. I'm happy to change what needs changing. >> > > Hi, > Have you read all previous emails on the topic that is posted to the > mailing list? > Also take a look at the commits that introduced the parts that you now are > changing. > > >> -- Neil Roza Principal Systems Engineer at Realtime Robotics P: 617.294.9853 E: n...@rtr.ai rtr.ai
_______________________________________________ ipxe-devel mailing list ipxe-devel@lists.ipxe.org https://lists.ipxe.org/mailman/listinfo/ipxe-devel
