On Sat, May 08, 2021 at 04:03:50AM +0300, Nikolai Zhubr wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've finished with the subject successfully.
Yeah \o/ \o/ \o/ chear
> What I've done is using prot_to_real implementation in current iPXE, I tried
> to mimic it as much as possible in respective place in Etherboot.
"in Etherboot", so not in iPXE.
> That is:
>
> - use ljmp instead of lret (after cr0 change);
> - assign ss and esp explicitely after that;
> - assign all other segment registers explicitely.
>
> Then Etherboot works fine on 486.
>
> So iPXE's implementation is likely correct and supposedly it should work
> too, as soon as all 586 opcodes are eliminated or handled carefully as
> discussed previously. However my brain has pretty much exploded already
> so I'm not going into more testing for now.
Any chance in dumping somewhere
a rough / rude version of the made changes?
Same request in other words:
Relief yourself from any quality demand and share you iPXE i80486 version.[1]
> Thank you,
Thank you for keeping us posted
and especially on reporting "problem solved"[2]
> Regards,
> Nikolai
Groeten
Geert Stappers
[1] I volunteer for converting "Here is my version" in a "git formatted
patch". Feel free to contact me off-list.
[2] I wish more people do that.
--
Silence is hard to parse
_______________________________________________
ipxe-devel mailing list
ipxe-devel@lists.ipxe.org
https://lists.ipxe.org/mailman/listinfo/ipxe-devel
