I just had a thought, as I read all these comments about QSL'ing, and that is 
that my original thoughts about QSL cards from BCB stations, dating back to 
about 1950 when I first learned of the QSL aspect of the hobby after DX'ing for 
three years on my own, now seem to be generally accepted by the industry.

It wasn't until I found Ken Boord's International Shortwave Column in Radio & 
Television News and learned that shortwave broadcast stations were courting 
listeners by sending out QSL cards that I realized that the ham radio practice 
of QSLing (which I'd learned from W7DE, Grant Feikert, the legendary chief 
engineer at KOAC-550, in my home town of Corvallis, Oregon) was mirrored by 
broadcast stations ... on shortwave.

As I began a collection of SWBC QSLs in 1950, there were a couple of unusual 
receptions on BCB that prompted me to send a reception report to those BCB 
stations from Corvallis ... one was a five-minute break in the somewhat sparse 
all-night action on 1340 that enabled WHHM in Memphis, Tennessee, to slip 
through ... and the other was sunrise reception of WLDS-1180 in Jacksonville, 
Illinois. I was surprised ... amazed, in fact .. that I received printed QSL 
cards from both stations.

My skepticism about BCB QSLs came from applying what I thought was common sense 
to the differences between hams and SWBC broadcasters on the one hand and 
medium wave stations on the other. Hams and SWBC stations were more likely to 
be interested in random reception in distant parts of the nation or the world, 
while broadcast stations would only be interested in listeners that would be of 
value to their advertisers. It wasn't until I was 15 years old (in 1950) that I 
learned something of the history of the DX'ing hobby, and the traditional 
compatibility of DX'ers and broadcasters. It amazed me, for example, that 
broadcast station personnel would get up early in the morning (when all the 
other stations on their frequency were silent) to put on special tests just for 
DX'ers.

But even in 1950, I didn't really jump back into BCB. My primary sources of 
information on radio remained Ken Boord's shortwave column and Broadcasting 
Magazine. I bought my first subscription to Broadcasting in 1950, when a check 
for $7 would bring the magazine every week PLUS the Broadcasting Yearbook. No 
longer did I have to go to the studio of KRUL-1340 in Corvallis, borrow their 
electric typewriter, and type the station list from the Yearbook. (That 
somewhat silly endeavor is what led to my typing the first NRC log in 1968, by 
the way.) I didn't join a club until 1955, when I joined the Universal Radio DX 
Club and the Newark News Radio Club, for their shortwave sections. I didn't 
join NRC until Spring 1956, after receiving a tape recorded reception report 
from Roy Millar in Issaquah, Washington, at KCOV-1240, Corvallis ... my first 
radio job. Roy, who become a long-time friend prior to his death a couple of 
years ago, talked me into 1) joining NRC and 2) doing a DX test!
 . With the closest AN station on 1240 somewhere in the Midwest, I got solid 
reception reports from Oklahoma west, all the way to New Zealand, for our 
little 250-watt signal. 

I jumped into BCB QSL-collecting in 1956, but I did not get quite so 
enthusiastic as the fellow who was the SWBC editor of the URDXC when I first 
joined in '55. That was Marv Robbins, in Omaha, Nebraska, and when Marv began 
to concentrate on BCB, he QSL'd 1,500-plus stations in three years. That was 
intensity ... but that also exemplified the cooperative attitude of broadcast 
station personnel. 

It took awhile before the consultants took over broadcasting and the 
predominant attitude became the practicality of the bottom line rather than the 
romance of unusual long-distance reception. "I heard KZZZ when it briefly 
squeezed through the babble on 1230 with a station ID and a commercial for 
Joe's Fish Market prior to AP Radio News at 2 a.m.," we'd write; and personnel 
at KZZZ who might have said "Wow!" in 1950 would say, "So what?" today.

I admire the diehard QSL collectors like Patrick Martin and Martin Foltz, among 
others active in this aspect of the hobby, who are able to work around the "so 
what" attitude with the understanding that today, a request for a QSL is asking 
someone to volunteer a few minutes time on an quirky, esoteric old hobby. A 
verification today is a favor, and those station personnel who are hit with the 
attitude expressed by some DX'ers that QSL'ing their report is an obligation 
make some broadcasting personnel think we're ALL nuisances.

I guess I was just ahead of my time when I was 12 to 15 years old.

Qal R. Mann, Krumudgeon

_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
[email protected]
http://arizona.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: [email protected]

Reply via email to