> Similarly, how is it better or worse for one person to presume illegal > activity based on clear and obvious willful interference and no > identification as versus another person to presume that everything is > legal based solely on one rather fragmented post claiming that was so.
I would also ask just what business any in here have to lodge a complaint? Unless someone is hiding something, there isn't a person in here with any legal standing to do so. KDKA, sure. A whole mess of 1610 TIS/HAR operators, plus a Canadian station or two? Absolutely. A DXer? No way. So why do it? Why put us in the foreground as a complaining party when we have suffered no damages? I said I'd shut up after my first reply, and I will. Some things needed clarifying.. Craig Healy Providence, RI _______________________________________________ IRCA mailing list [email protected] http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org To Post a message: [email protected]
