--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> 
> I like to use CoolEdit 2000 which, in the end, gives a graphical
> picture of 
> the amplitude of the audio. If I record with the receiver's AGC off,
> it's easy 
> to quickly pick out the parts of the recording that has popped up out
> of the 
> jumble. I can go through 12 hours of recording in a half hour just
> listening to 
> the highlights. It can be done with the AGC on (like on my FM
> receiver), but 
> it's not as easy.
> 


That's one of the reasons I switched to doing all of my reviews of
recordings from TR to Power Audio Editor - being able to see, depending
on channel, the peaks or the dips and focus on those. Cool Edit is more
cumbersome to operate and takes a lot longer to load a similarly-sized
file. 



Russ Edmunds
Blue Bell, PA ( 360' ASL )
[15 mi NNW of Philadelphia]
40:08:45N; 75:16:04W, Grid FN20id
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
FM: Yamaha T-80 & Onkyo T-450RDS w/ APS9B @15'
AM: Hammarlund HQ-150 & 4' FET air core loop


 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Don't pick lemons.
See all the new 2007 cars at Yahoo! Autos.
http://autos.yahoo.com/new_cars.html 
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
[email protected]
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: [email protected]

Reply via email to