Interesting to read your observations, Nick (and the other fellas down south). It was my sense that things were excellent this morning, and favoured Korea, especially. To be honest, though, I fixated on AFN Japan on 1575 which totally dominated the channel for hours this morning with signals up to S9! Almost armchair, anyway. I called HLAZ this morning a 10...absolutely armchair copy, and this went on until Russian s/off at 17:30! I'm going to miss this dx when I return home to Victoria! :-( .....Walt.
----- Original Message ----- From: Nick Hall-Patch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Friday, February 16, 2007 7:34 am Subject: Re: [IRCA] TPs for 2-16 > At 14:36 16/02/2007, you wrote: > > >Only 3 carriers were heard today and they were 594, 774 and 1566 > >heard from 1350-1415 UT. > > > Approaching 1530UT, and weak audio noted on 612 (Aussie), 774, > 1287and 1566 (Asia) > > However, many of the 9 kHz channels were without carriers, or very > poor ones. At 1531UT, 774 had faded up to quite readable audio, > but > 873 for example hardly had any carrier at all, and 1134 none, > though > there had been something there earlier. > > best wishes, > > Nick > > > > > **************************************************************************** > Nick Hall-Patch > Victoria, B.C. > Canada > > **************************************************************************** > > _______________________________________________ > IRCA mailing list > [email protected] > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca > > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of > the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the > opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers > > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org > > To Post a message: [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ IRCA mailing list [email protected] http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org To Post a message: [email protected]
