> 
> --- Les Rayburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 
> .
> > 
> > The disadvantage is that DX'ers would need accurate receivers with
> > TXCO's if 
> > possible,
> > good quality soundcards, and computers...and the knowledge to use
> it
> > all. 
> > But I've long
> > preached that we need to adapt and adopt new techniques.
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> *** I think that perhaps what you suggest above is going to be
> impossible for the many and doable for the few. Whether the gating
> factor is technical proficiency, or in dollars, I believe we have to
> weigh the possibility of creating DX Tests which fewer people can
> hear/report rather than more.
> 
> And I have yet to try a Spectrunm analyzer program which I could
> operate. As it is I still have an old Heathkit SB-620 modified for MW
> by Bob Foxworth.
> 
> Russ Edmunds
> Blue Bell, PA ( 360' ASL )
> [15 mi NNW of Philadelphia]
> 40:08:45N; 75:16:04W, Grid FN20id
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> FM: Yamaha T-80 & Onkyo T-450RDS w/ APS9B @15'
> AM: Hammarlund HQ-150 & 4' FET air core loop
> 
>



 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Need Mail bonding?
Go to the Yahoo! Mail Q&A for great tips from Yahoo! Answers users.
http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396546091
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
[email protected]
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: [email protected]

Reply via email to