At 04:04 PM 3/19/2007 -0500, you wrote: >Charles, > >You're certainly entitled to your opinion. For the record, what do you >consider "special effects"? In the 1970's or 1980's, receivers >with IF DSP would have seemed like magic.
Les, OK, you've taken me in back of the wood shed and given me a good trashing. Hi. Somehow, I didn't expect everyone to leap up and as shout, "Charles, you've got a point there!" I'm taking the view that IBOC will crash. But if the band is wall-to-wall hiss, I'm not much for continuing. I'll just have to migrate to SWBC in the meantime. No matter whether you use a beverage, active antenna or loop; if you log an ID by a human voice in whatever language on LSB, USB or AM, that's a log- ging. If there's no human voice, then it all seems pretty empty to me. The human factor. I have logged MedFERs just above the old 1600 kHz top frequency. All on tape, but I don't count them as they're not BC stations. >And I can almost bet that your station count is much higher than mine will >ever be. I think I've logged about 600 stations in nearly five years. Not >too impressive, huh? A big part of the reason is that most of my hobby >time is consumed with organizing DX tests, replying to QSL requests, >and trying to figure out ways to make the whole experience better. I'm a DX "libertarian." I don't request QSLs because I think of the guy who has to do the job of preparing one. But if I can persuade a station to do a DX test for you all, you bet I will! Yes, your point is well taken: we must keep up the times. But if have to log stations by copying code, then I really should be on the ham bands. >Anyone who thinks I'm in this for logging totals isn't seeing the big >picture. That remark about "whatever increases your station count" seems to have not been well thought out. I regret it. Still, if I'm going to turn into a sonarman to log my stations, then I don't belong on the 530 - 1710 kHz AM band. 73, Charles Charles A Taylor, WD4INP Greenville, North Carolina _______________________________________________ IRCA mailing list [email protected] http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org To Post a message: [email protected]
