--- Patrick Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Scott, > > Very interesting. So it sounds (If I am correct?) that a > communications > receiver could be built to solve our IBOC issues? I asked that > question > a couple of times early on with the IBOC discussion along with a > noise > blanker to take it out and several responded saying it could not be > done. So I dropped that thought. Well, maybe just maybe one of the > receiver manufacturers could take this issue on. >
*** I am not so sure. The writer seemed to bounce around the subject in such a way that I found it difficult to determine which interference problems he was suggesting a solution for; whether his solution contemplated the current hybrid mode, an all-digital scenario or something else. It appeared to me that he wasn't really addressing the adjacent channel interference, but rather something else, but I'm still not sure. I don't have any knowledge in the area of receiver design, so part of it lost me completely. Russ Edmunds Blue Bell, PA ( 360' ASL ) [15 mi NNW of Philadelphia] 40:08:45N; 75:16:04W, Grid FN20id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> FM: Yamaha T-80 & Onkyo T-450RDS w/ APS9B @15' AM: Hammarlund HQ-150 & 4' FET air core loop ____________________________________________________________________________________ Looking for earth-friendly autos? Browse Top Cars by "Green Rating" at Yahoo! Autos' Green Center. http://autos.yahoo.com/green_center/ _______________________________________________ IRCA mailing list [email protected] http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org To Post a message: [email protected]
