Group:
After typing many an "at" and "dot," I have formulated a question in my mind.
Someone with more knowledge of spammers, please answer this:
Using my best-known, and primarily social/church/family e-mail address as an
example:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
most feel comfortable with the format "calltaylor at isp dot com."
I would like the most knowledgeable to advise me whether
"calltaylor isp com"
is a secure alternative.
I understand that the objective here is to make an e-mail address less
obvious to a "spambot" (as I call them) search engine. It appears to me
that the second alternative is just as secure, and a dern-sight more brief
that the first.
(Incidentally, that username <calltaylor> was intended to mean "Charles A
(and) Leonor L" [CALL]. It has been available at every ISP that I have
tried in the past years.
It got to be too much to filter all MWDX, R-390A, ham, church, social and
business junk through one username!
73 from CAT
Charles A Taylor, WD4INP
Greenville, North Carolina
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
[email protected]
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its
editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: [email protected]
