At 10:54 PM 6/4/2007 -0400, you wrote:
>At 09:49 PM 6/4/2007 -0400, you wrote: > > >On a non-d station, all you'd need to do is file the right paperwork after > >measuring the base impedance. On a directional station you'd likely need to > >do what's called a partial proof. Ten measurements on every radial(1) - at > >least eight - from 2 to 10 miles from the towers. That would be an > >excellent way as you could compare it to the buried radial system. See what > >the nulls were, and the peak reading of the major lobe(s). > >Fellow Kilocycle Chasers: > >(1) Radial, in this instance, is a line drawn on a map. An engineer draws >an azimuth (a line) on a map, and drives to points on each azimuth and >measures the field intensity of the station in question. > I should have written that the radials or azimuths have their point of origin at the transmitter tower. More like SPOKES on a wheel. There, I got that out. Charles Charles A Taylor, WD4INP Greenville, North Carolina _______________________________________________ IRCA mailing list [email protected] http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org To Post a message: [email protected]
