Exactly. With current HD sizes there is no need for a specific buffer. I 
have RecAll Pro always on, I have just set a file limit of 100 MB, which is 
more than 10 hours and in the end you just decide whether to delete the file 
or to go back to check something.

73, Mauno

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bill Harms" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America" 
<[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 11:50 PM
Subject: Re: [IRCA] Recording equipment question


> Oh, in that case, I would run it full time.
>
>
> Russ Edmunds wrote:
>> --- Bill Harms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Russ:
>>>
>>> I generally figure that 15 minutes is long enough to go back and
>>> listen again to something I did not hear clearly the first time.
>>> You can change it to whatever length of time you want, 30 minutes
>>> like you do, or 1 hour, 2 hours, 6 hours, one day, or whatever.
>>> (You can increase or decrease it on the fly too, and I have done
>>> that when there is a fantastic opening.)
>>>
>>
>>
>> I'm thinking in terms of a good TA opening, such as we've had a
>> couple of times at LBI, you'd need hours. 15 minutes is fine if
>> you're DX'ing and happen to hear only one or two things per 15
>> minutes you want to check out. Depends entirely on the situation, I
>> guess.
>>
>
>
> -- 
> Bill Harms
> Elkridge, Maryland
> Check out the Spokane Radio History Pages
> http://spokane.philcobill.com
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the 
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the 
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: [email protected]
>
> 

_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
[email protected]
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: [email protected]

Reply via email to