After getting at least five different voice mails, I finally got a human on the other end at WBAL. It was a receptionist who just took my complaint and not my name or phone number. I wanted to talk with someone in management or in engineering. Maybe one of them will call back from my voice mail messages I left. So far my email to the programming and production departments has gone unanswered. They do not list an email address for their engineering department.
Bill Neil Kazaross wrote: > If your are getting WBAL that strong and have issues with WTAM's IBOC..all I > can say is WOW..and let WBAL know. > > 73 KAZ > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Bill Harms" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2007 5:39 PM > Subject: [NRC-AM] Re: WBAL is better now > > >> Barry, this is what that site returned. Interestingly, WCBM has a >> stronger signal according to the site. >> >> WCBM-N 81.2 dBu 11.51 mV/m >> WBAL-N 79.8 dBu 9.79 mV/m >> >> Bill >> >> Barry McLarnon wrote: >> >>> Bill, I'm curious to know what the field strength of WBAL is at your >>> location. >>> Please go to http://www.v-soft.com/ZipSignal/default.htm, enter your zip >>> code, and see what it tells you for WBAL. >>> >>> For anyone else who is experiencing IBOC interference on local >>> (groundwave) signals, please try the above service and let us know what >>> the calculated field strength is, along with some description of the >>> severity of the interference. The field strength at your location could >>> be a *very* useful addition to the report that you send to the affected >>> station. >>> >>> Barry >>> -- Bill Harms Elkridge, Maryland Check out the Spokane Radio History Pages http://spokaneradio.philcobill.com and the Spokane Radio Tower Pages http://spokanetowers.philcobill.com _______________________________________________ IRCA mailing list [email protected] http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org To Post a message: [email protected]
