Implied easment by prescription beyond the NIF, due to historical and continuous skywave listenership.
Interesting. I wonder how that would play out in a court of law? On 10/9/07, Craig Healy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Third, a group of small station operators get together and file a lawsuit > against IBOC interference to their signals. People have had the right to > listen to non-local stations since radio was invented. IBOC removes that. > The parallel is to real estate. When a property is used for decades by > someone who is not the owner, a certain adverse possession right gradually > is created. Courts have recognized this for a long time. Why is the > ability to listen to non-locals any different? Don't we have an adverse > possession right here? I hope a court can be made to see that and act > appropriately against IBOC, the FCC and it's proponents. > > -- Mesa Mike LA de NM _______________________________________________ IRCA mailing list [email protected] http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org To Post a message: [email protected]
