The picture wasn't quite as rosy for the TPs here, I suppose because my TP path is that little bit further north. I did hear the Japanese on 594 and 693, and noted a handful of other TP carriers. DUs still predominated though. Noted a music program on 531 (2PM would be most likely I assume), quite decent signals from 3GI on 828, a mix of the Aussies on 891, an Aussie mixing with Fiji on 639, and bits of Aussie audio on 675. All the action seemed to be on the low end of the dial. Only audio above 1000 khz was on 1116, which had a couple of decent spurts, but generally was poorer than it often is.
73, Nigel Pimblett Dunmore, Alberta John H. Bryant wrote: >Thankfully, recovery is already well under way. Things were almost >"normal" for me below 1100 kHz. Above there, I had quite a few hets, >but little useable audio except 1566 & 1575. Late, 1287 in JJ came up >to useable level, other than that: nothing of use above 1100. > >High points on the low band included: > >The Big JJs doing better than what has been normal the past three weeks. > >621: Radio Rossii was in very nicely for a while > >CNR1 was present on 639 // 756 // 945 > >I've been watching 972, the Big Gun Korean, all season. I'd swear >that the modulation was down some. Seems to have much more carrier >than audio. Anybody else feel that way. > >Nice morning, with better to come soon! > >John B. > >_______________________________________________ >IRCA mailing list >[email protected] >http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca > >Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original >contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its >editors, publishing staff, or officers > >For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org > >To Post a message: [email protected] > > > _______________________________________________ IRCA mailing list [email protected] http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org To Post a message: [email protected]
