The powerful Japanese stations were really good today, but that didn't extend more generally. 594 in particular was very strong, blasting through the IBOC noise from KOJM. Did note the Chinese on 1044 and 1206, nearly always the two best here. For some reason, the Japanese on 1179 has been the best Japanese of late, outside of the big guns. This morning it had pretty fair audio, whereas there was nothing from 1134, 1242, 1287 etc. Would have been perfectly readable if not for a very strong KOFI on 1180. I should mention that I've observed the same as Dennis, signals haven't been getting a significant boost near sunrise, and in fact some days are fading by then.
73, Nigel Pimblett Dunmore, Alberta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Listened from 1230-1405 ut. Better than yesterday here. Conditions don't >seem to be getting better as sunrise nears. > > >153 Russia, 1238 faint with man in Russian. > >180 Russia, 1238 weak with man in Russian. > >189 Russia, 1239 weak with man in Russian. > >279 Russia, 1239 very weak with man in Russian. > >567 Japan, JOIK 1245 very weak with Japanese singing and // 594. > >594 Japan, JOAK 1248 weak with Japanese singing and // 567 > >648 Russia, 1259 short phrase repeated many times, 1300 VOA English >ID. Korean > program? Will record next time heard at 1300. > >666 Japan, JOBK 1306 weak with man in Japanese. > >693 Japan, JOAB 1348 weak with man in Japanese and splatter. > >774 Japan, JOUB 1230 good with the end of English lessons. > >828 Japan, JOBB 1313 weak with man in Japanese. > >873 Japan JOGB 1315 weak with man in Japanese. > >1377 China CRN1 1326 weak with woman in Chinese. > >1566 Republic of Korea 1331 good with Japanese. > >1575 Thailand, VOA 1335 man in Asian language. > >Dennis, >Vancouver, WA >JRC 545 Ewe NW >Solar Indices SF 67 A 4 K 2 >_______________________________________________ >IRCA mailing list >[email protected] >http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca > >Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original >contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its >editors, publishing staff, or officers > >For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org > >To Post a message: [email protected] > > > _______________________________________________ IRCA mailing list [email protected] http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org To Post a message: [email protected]
