Same situation here, Paul - no ID, but the gospel station was present most
of the hour. Given your and my locations, I am taking a guess that it might
have been WFLT-MI,
Brett

On 11/4/07, Paul B. Walker, Jr. < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Brett:
>
> I heard the gospel station too and WHK... WHK wasthe dominant station
> here.
> I never heard the gospel station id though. the signal wasnt great at
> all..
> but it was constant.
>
> Paul
>
>
>
> On Nov 4, 2007 8:38 AM, Brett Saylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
>
> > Just got through the 1 hour recording; WHK-OH dominated but, at times,
> the
> > channel was more like a graveyard. Heard a gospel station under WHK most
> > of
> > the time but also caught bits of oldies and standards.
> > At 0927 UTC I heard a tone for ~ 10 seconds, and *maybe* two characters
> of
> > morse code a minute later. The code could have been part of the music,
> but
> > the tone was pretty distinct.
> >
> > Thanks to all who arranged for and participated in the test,
> >
> > Brett Saylor
> > Central PA
> > SDR-IQ receiver and 100' sloper antenna
> >  __
> >
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com<http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca>
> /mailman/listinfo/irca<http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca>
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: [email protected]
>
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
[email protected]
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: [email protected]

Reply via email to