On my drive to work this morning, I was able to pick up a carrier on 963 along with ever-weak local on 960. Their IBOC on 950 and 970 was stronger than their signal, so I could hear 963 carrier. Don't know who though.
Mike Campbell CA (at 75 mph at the time!) "John H. Bryant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I had a late night last night and, happily, was at the dial only one hour before dawn. TP conditions were very poor then and actually got worse, overall, at dawn. I had about 25 in some forem of audio, but it was almost all at the mumble level. Early, I could ID the language on 747, 774 (the best of the AM, both early and late) 828, 873 (which was JJ, not the slightly more normal KK, 945-CNR and 1566. At dawn, some of those were down and a few were at the same level. They were joined 1053 (JJ) AND THAT IS ALL. Biggest thrill of the morning was at dawn on 1260 hearing threshold non-english under a fading CFRN, Edmonton... I was hanging in their, hoping for a rise to be able to ID the language... decided to flip the array to a southeasterly direction (backwards) and darned if I hadn't been DXing a nulled back-side SS-speaker! *^*^&[EMAIL PROTECTED]@. Two more mornings for me.... hoping for a quick rebound! John B. _______________________________________________ IRCA mailing list [email protected] http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org To Post a message: [email protected] __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ IRCA mailing list [email protected] http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org To Post a message: [email protected]
