It seemed to be a fair morning here,didn't spend too much time at it but listening at 1530 there were hets everywhere and excellent audio from 1566 and 1593. 1566 still had a good het at 1735 ut. The results are skewed a bit since the 1000 foot JA beverage didn't seem to produce nearly as much signal as the 160m dipole did. However the dipole feed has a built in bandpass filter that reduces signal in the mw spectrum, so only signals at the top of the band had a chance to get thru the rolloff. We have no locals above 930 khz (1260 is almost DX here at night) so that makes a good combination.
In spite of the quiet conditions, it was not any kind of a good TA opening as no carriers noted at any time during the day. I didn't listen after sunset. 73 Don VE6JY Lamont, Alberta On Dec 4, 2007 5:27 AM, Nick Hall-Patch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Not much time this morning; a quick listen at 1410UT, and the > impression was a better morning than yesterday, though still not > much in the way of second string audios > > Asian unless indicated otherwise: > > > Darn good audio, if briefly: 828 > > Reasonable audio (though often battling w/splash): 594, 747, 774, 1287 > > Not so reasonable audio, occasional words in splash or noise: 567, > 612 DU, 873, 1377 CNR1, 1566 > > Burbles in the splatter: 558, 639 DU?, 738, 1134, 1188, 1323 > > strong carrier, no audio: > > > > best wishes, > > Nick > > > > > **************************************************************************** > Nick Hall-Patch > Victoria, B.C. > Canada > > > **************************************************************************** > > _______________________________________________ > IRCA mailing list > [email protected] > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca > > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the > original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the > IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers > > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org > > To Post a message: [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ IRCA mailing list [email protected] http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org To Post a message: [email protected]
