Thanks, Gary. Amazon got my hard-earned fifteen bucks last night for a '59.
I'm looking forward to doing a little '59 vs '210V shootout meself. Sure
wish the TP sigs were beefier here in the RF hole, tho. The hets have a hard
enough time getting to my R8, much less these pipsqueaks, hi.

73,
Bruce

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, December 07, 2007 12:45 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [IRCA] All Hail the SRF-59!
> 
> OK Bruce,
>  
>      The DT210V sounds good enough to be a worthy  contestant 
> in the next
> (2008) Pocket Radio Shootout, after this year's  competitors 
> slug it out.  It will be ordered ASAP (as if I really needed  
> any persuasion).  9 kHz splits with memories is a great 
> advantage, although  my own experience leads me to doubt that 
> any digital pocket radio can equal the  SRF-59's selectivity. 
>  Sony has packed some mean power in that SRF-59  design, and 
> if you can adjust to the analog tuning, it's truly  a DXer's 
> dream machine.
>  
>                                                               
>                 
>                     73,  Gary 
> 
> 
> 
> **************************************Check out AOL's list of 
> 2007's hottest products.
> (http://money.aol.com/special/hot-products-2007?NCID=aoltop000
> 30000000001)
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> 
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those 
> of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect 
> the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> 
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> 
> To Post a message: [email protected]
> 

_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
[email protected]
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: [email protected]

Reply via email to