--- Tim Kridel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Although the FCC might end up taking the heat for the DTV transition,
> ultimately it's Congress' lust for the auction revenue driving the
> timetable.
>
>
>
I disagree, at least partially. The timetable is largely driven by
agreements made a few years ago to re-allocate the spectrum. Many
portions of it are already allocated and the new users impatient.
Congress didn't negotiate those. Further, there was more than ample
time for the FCC to have done what needed to be done and still comply
with the timetable.
The current FCC simply doesn't really care about the public/audience.
They're more interested in benefitting the industry.
There was probably never a sufficient timetable to allow for any
serious phased deployment, however there was time for some phased tests
as discussed earlier. There was also time to have done some
shortened-up phase-ins.
Russ Edmunds
Blue Bell, PA ( 360' ASL )
[15 mi NNW of Philadelphia]
40:08:45N; 75:16:04W, Grid FN20id
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
FM: Yamaha T-80 & Onkyo T-450RDS w/ APS9B @15'
AM: Hammarlund HQ-150 & 4' FET air core loop
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
[email protected]
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its
editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: [email protected]
