Nick,
The Asiatics peaked here during the 1400 ut hour. Spent
a lot of time trying to hear one of the Japanese powerhouse
stations on the SRF-59 & SRF M85V. Got carriers on both,
but no audio. Even when outdoors to the driver element of
the Ewe and it brought up the levels, but not enough for
audio. Indoors tried the Space Magnet and Terf loop.
Will keep trying, think I might have better luck at
Grayland this coming week.
Dennis,
Salmon Creek, WA
-------------- Original message --------------
From: Nick Hall-Patch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> At 15:13 13/01/2008, you wrote:
>
>
> >--
> >Good Morning:
> >
> >Listened from 1345-1511 ut. Top of the MW band poor.
> >
> >
> >
> >594 Japan JOAK 1/13 1400 weak with man in Japanese.
> >
> >657 DPR Korea, 1/13 1452 weak with music.
> >
> >774 Japan, JOUB 1/13 1405 fair with man in Japanese.
> >
> >828 Japan, JOBB 1/13 1406 fair with man in Japanese
>
> Obviously, earlier was better for the low band Asiatics, Dennis. I
> didn't start listening until 1515UT, and couldn't dig anything out of
> 594 by then, but the propagation monitor says it was good before 1400UT.
>
> Good carriers on 639, 738, 792 and 1098 pointed to DU conditions, but
> also had a good carrier on 972, and touches of JJ audio on 747, 774
> and 828, with 774 being the "best", i.e. hardly identifiable as Japanese.
>
> best wishes,
>
> Nick
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original
> contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its
> editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: [email protected]
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
[email protected]
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its
editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: [email protected]
