At 06:42 AM 8/15/2008, you wrote:
>It was another very good transitional morning, with about thirty audios. 
>Today, for the first time, multiple Asians stayed in clear to dawn fade and 
>most of the  DUs were quite late and weak.  At 1251, about 10 minutes to dawn, 
>774 Japan peaked at a solid 9 with the Aussie audible, too, but far down from 
>the JJ. I listened to  1300 TOH on 774 for the first time this season.
>
>There were several interesting Asians this AM. 621 seemed Chinese, but I 
>wasn't smart enough to do the SW parallel for Heilongjiang PBS. 918, 936, 963 
>and 1017 were all in from China at 7s. 837 seemed either Chinese or NK, but 
>VERY undermodulated. On 1053, the first time I tuned by, I heard typical NK 
>martial music, but later it was all jammer. At 1230, 864 was in with an 
>8-level carrier, but very undermodulated.... sounded like 738 at its worst... 
>not really sure who this could be, but this is the second or third AM that 
>I've heard the same thing. The N.Koreans on 819 and 855.055 were both doing 
>well for a while with martial chorus music. I think that they were playing the 
>same piece, but not in //.
>
>I sure hope that these mornings are leading to a superior fall season.  The 
>amount of JJ activity is just a little above the last several years, but the 
>almost daily CC and North Korean activity seems very, very early in the 
>season.... like by a full month or more.
>
>Here's hoping!
>
>I'll bet that Walter will stumble into a treasure trove of Asians as soon as 
>he hits their cottage in the Queen Charlottes.... Man, it ought to be hip 
>deep! Bon voyage, Walter!!!
>
>I'm going to spend most of next week in Grayland, starting with dawn on 
>Tuesday.
>
>John B.


John, I'll be hitting the road shortly.  Good that you'll be at Grayland....we 
can compare notes.  I'll check in as I can from the internet cafe, assuming 
that my awful internet connection from the cabin still doesn't work most of the 
time.......Walt.


_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
[email protected]
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: [email protected]

Reply via email to