Many TA's audible tonite here in coastal WI. Esp mid band. High band not so 
special nor was low band but mid band rocked. 1134 Croatia was often 
entertainment quality in 6 Khz filter with local WISN phased out. 1125 Belgium 
atop Spain (Croatia has left that channel) as and example. 1215 and 1206 often 
clear as day. 1053 UK good earlier, but Romania thru them for a while for a new 
country when things peaks around 0330-0420. My 972 was NDR from Germany. Not 
much on 1566 here, but a 35 deg BOG is not the right direction for Benin on 
high end. All in all probably 40 channels with at least trace audio. Was nice 
to pull in Portugal on 720 again while phasing out the Cubs loss on WGN but 
bothered by WOR IBOC at times..no trace of Canaries as these BOGs aim rather to 
far north for them. Czech on 954 also in there as this direction BOG is not 
optimal for Spain and is better for northern and more easterly Europe. Holland 
675 with rlg mx as examples. 873 had AFN Germany well atop Spain.
  

I'll again mention Mauretania 783 which stays on past 0100 // 4845 and gets out 
well and isn't hard here when I phase null WBBM. 

Maritime domestics good. CKNB 950 in. Nfld on 750 in there with WSB phased but 
lost to C&W WARD. CFDR backgrounding WBBM with C&W. 

Denmark on 1062 with stunning signal. IS then clear Danish news. 

IBOC a huge pain here. But phased BOGs help lots. Without phasing I'd have much 
more IBOC misery as well as much more QRM from pests. 

Nigel, hopefully your K9AY can null Denver IBOC but if not, phase it vs 
something as Denver is close enough to opposite your TA direction, IMHO. From 
your QTH...SE Alberta isn't it ? I suspect that you can phase out any IBOC QRM 
for TA'a or TP's (Japs, Koreans, Chinese etc rather than DU's) without harming 
the DX signal

73 de KAZ.. will do a more formal report soon. .. Grafton WI..R8A and 425 ft // 
297 foot Phased BOGs at 35 deg atop the bluff 150 ft above Lake Michigan. 

-----Original Message-----
>From: Nigel Pimblett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Sep 3, 2008 12:40 AM
>To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America 
><[email protected]>
>Subject: Re: [IRCA] TA carriers 09-02-08
>
>I got my K9AY back in operation today, and was rewarded with my first TA 
>audio of the season,  old reliable Virigin Radio (though soon to be 
>Absolute) on 1215.   Rather weak audio, but at least it was there.  Some 
>good carriers on 1566 (maybe Benin??),1377, 1089, and 855 (through the 
>KOA IBOC), as well as a number of weaker ones.   I do notice IBOC is a 
>bigger pain this fall than it was last, with the Denver stations being 
>especially annoying at this QTH.
>
>73,
>
>Nigel Pimblett
>Dunmore, Alberta
>
>
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>>--
>>Good Evening,
>>
>>A few TA carriers in this evening.  1215 kHz is in with a level 4 carrier.
>>1377 kHz was also noted with a level 4 carrier.  Time is 0344 utc.
>>
>>Dennis,
>>Salmon Creek, WA
>>JRC 545 U shaped fence antenna 150'
>>_______________________________________________
>>IRCA mailing list
>>[email protected]
>>http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>>
>>Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
>>contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
>>editors, publishing staff, or officers
>>
>>For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>>
>>To Post a message: [email protected]
>>
>>  
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>IRCA mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
>Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
>contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
>editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
>For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
>To Post a message: [email protected]
>

_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
[email protected]
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: [email protected]

Reply via email to