Well, I should've made myself a little clearer, even though the region is on
9Khz splits, several of 9khz splits would hit what we in the 50 US consider
a 10Khz channel, IE 630Khz.

How could KUAM be on 610kHz? THat's not a 9kHz channel.. but I don't know
anything about 9kHz spacing or TPs, etc

I also see a new AM Permit was granted on Guam just 2 months ago, 4KW Non
Directional Fulltime on 1017kHz.

Paul



On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 11:34 PM, Pete Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Paul B. Walker, Jr. wrote:
>
> The reason KUAM moved is because noadays with radios in the south pacific
>> being manufactured on 10Khz splits,  it makes them harder to listen to if
>> a
>> statioon is on a 9Khz split and not a 10.
>>
>
> Actually, the whole region is in 9Khz mode. People in our territories with
> American cars with 10kHz spacing had problems tuning in. This transition has
> been going on for more than a year. The outcome makes it more difficult for
> US DXers since these stations will be on our own domestic frequencies. I
> have seen a number of these application so through but don't recall one yet
> from KTWG-801.
>
> For the record, before November 1978, KUAM was on 610.
>
> Pete Taylor
> Tacoma, WA
> 12225w 4719n
> HQ180 + Kiwa air core loop
> ICF2010 + "     "    "      "
> DX398; Palomar loop
> SRF-59 & SRF M37V
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: [email protected]
>
>


-- 
Sincerely,
Paul B. Walker, Jr.
http://www.realradiousa.com
http://www.myspace.com/walkerbroadcasting
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
[email protected]
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: [email protected]

Reply via email to