At 06:14 AM 11/26/2008, you wrote: >Interesting, as my observations here were very similar. I only had time for a >real quick check this morning before heading to work, but as you noted, 567 >was doing very well in relation to the others, and 774 was quite weak. >Perhaps southern Alberta conditions relate more closely to OK than WA? > >73, > >Nigel Pimblett >Dunmore, AB
Despite very unfavourable A/K indices, I was taken aback with the good conditions this morning. Great audio up and down the band....better than many "average" Sept/Oct mornings with 2nd and 3rd tier channels often yielding some audio. JJ and KK seemed to be in well with signals much stronger than usual. One exception, though, was the rather poor/fair performance for JOAK 594 compared to everyone else. It rated a "7" at 15:24. 1575 is very strong as well. Easily a 9. Would have sworn things would have been poor! Unfortunately with a sizeable number of deliveries lately, don't have the time this morning to really go through things as much as I would have liked. Hopefully this bodes well for Chuck Hutton's and my upcoming DXpedition to Winter Harbour, on the north west coast of Vancouver Island!.....Walt _______________________________________________ IRCA mailing list [email protected] http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org To Post a message: [email protected]
