Interesting to see you speaking of a melt down. Weds the slightly AU cx meant that I didn't have any UK on 1053 so I could log 1053 Libya // 972. Guys in New England hardly noticed any change in TA cx.
However, let AU cx kick up a bit more and you guys out west with more northerly bearings get almost nothing while me in WI/IL am reduced to SW Europe or North Africa. 73 KAZ -----Original Message----- >From: Nigel Pimblett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Nov 28, 2008 10:54 PM >To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America ><[email protected]> >Subject: Re: [IRCA] Decent TA LWBC, NE Oregon > >I'd been noticing some MW TA carriers also, for the first time since the >meltdown of a few days ago. As is the case in OR 1134 is the best. >None are all that strong, but at least it's a step in the right >direction. Out of curiouity I also checked on LW and indeed I can hear >weak audio on 171. Hearing any audio on LW at my home location is >very rare, as usually it requires a trip out to the beverage farm to >pull in any longwave. > >73, > >Nigel Pimblett >Dunmore, Alberta > >Steve Ratzlaff wrote: > >> 171 Morocco at weak/medium (7-7.5) at present, 0340 utc. Not heard at >> this level for a couple of weeks I think. Other LWBC 153, 162, 180, >> 189, 198, 207, 252 all much poorer than 171. Lots of low-band MW hets; >> 1134 close to audio at times, 1377 next. >> Steve >> NE Oregon >> R75, longwires, terminated MW TA loop >> _______________________________________________ >> IRCA mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca >> >> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the >> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of >> the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers >> >> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org >> >> To Post a message: [email protected] >> > >_______________________________________________ >IRCA mailing list >[email protected] >http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca > >Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original >contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its >editors, publishing staff, or officers > >For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org > >To Post a message: [email protected] > _______________________________________________ IRCA mailing list [email protected] http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org To Post a message: [email protected]
